My heart leaps up when I behold
A Rainbow in the sky:
So was it when my life began;
So is it now I am a man;
So be it when I shall grow old,
Or let me die!
The Child is father of the man;
And I wish my days to be
Bound each to each by natural
piety. – William Wordsworth
Perhaps nothing can sum up the experience of watching this
modern masterpiece than the visionary poetry of the great romantic. But first
thing first. I must say I have never seen something so beautiful in my life-
forget the ‘Baraka’, ‘Heima’ and whatever the most beautiful thing on screen
you’ve seen. Everything seems just pale compare to this height of visual treat.
It takes you to the different world and gives you unforgettable unique experience; films like these are
benchmark to the magic of cinema encompassing all other arts. Though I watch it
on bluray digital print, I have a huge regret of missing the film on big
screen. The film is modern avante garde in terms of visuals. Every frame is eye-catching
wallpaper and absolutely sumptuous food of aesthetics. It gives me goose bumps
in many frames, especially the tour of genesis/evolution. Emmanuel Lubezki’s graceful
camera work and Jack Fisk's production designs are the benchmark for generation to follow.
Back to visionary humanitarian auteur
Terrence Malick. We all know that this is his most ambitious project and he
treated it with all his soul and heart at right places. It isn’t as abstract as
some claimed it since it has clearly no story or plot in his two and half hours
long duration. Most of the time characters utter only internal monologues based
on memory. The film is spiritual journey exploring life and to decipher its
true nature from eyes of poet. The root of the film is absolutely based on
the Book of Job and Malick clearly gave clues in the very beginning. Characters or actors or plot are fragmentary and wisp in the wind here, since the film is about humanity in
general rather than anything specific or particular. It begins with death
of a beloved child and follows up with the recollections of childhood memory by
the sibling brother who’s now a grown up mid age man reminiscing about those
inseparable moments of memory of internal and physical growth in the life and shadows of his father and
mother. Than on it takes you to the tour of life, its evolution and than fixing
it to one particular family again to witness the course of life in its minute details of the growth of a child- reflecting the curiosity and innocence of child, encountering the different forms of
life, witnessing deformed one and death, feeling abstract emotions of life with
wonder and shocks of inscrutable nature and lord almighty. The film is absolutely
spiritual experience not to be missed.
The child’s shift between the
strictly disciplinarian spartan father and unconditional love of mother is
quite genuine lesson to learn between our struggling confrontations between the
skeptical mind and graceful heart full of faith, between logic and emotions and between
the evolutionary survival of the fittest and compassionate humanity at general and like many
things Malick gave clue about this too in the very beginning- “A man’s heart has heard two ways through life. The way of nature and
the way of grace. You have to choose which one you’ll follow. Grace doesn’t try
to please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked. It accepts
insults and injuries. Nature only wants to please itself and get others to
please it too. It likes to lord it over them to have its own way. It finds
reasons to be unhappy when all the world is shining around it and love is
smiling all through it. They taught us, that no one who loves the way of grace
ever comes to bad end.”
The only drawback of the film is it's length, as in the final half an hour, the film seems too stretching one and it won't give me something which i call 'a height of leap', what i found in cinema of Masters like Bresson and Tarkovsky and that's the only major or minor drawback. It maybe possible that i can change my opinion about this in my second viewing as I don’t think one can comprehend
fully the film of this canvas with just a single viewing. No, it’s not because it’s too abstract
and too symbolic but because it’s something so universal and timeless which maybe grows on you and opens up new vistas after witnessing
it the second time.
The film of the year.
Ratings-9/10